<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">D. Vanrompay</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A. Van Nerom</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">R. Ducatelle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Haesebrouck,F.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evaluation of five immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia psittaci in cloacal and conjunctival specimens from turkeys9199</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">J.Clin.Microbiol.</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">a</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Animals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">article</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Australia</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Belgium</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cell</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cells</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chlamydophila psittaci</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cloaca</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparative Study</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conjunctiva</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conjunctivitis,Bacterial</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">detection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diagnosis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diagnostics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">disease</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diseases</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">EVALUATION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evaluation Studies as Topic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fluorescent Antibody Technique</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">im</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Immunoassay</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">immunology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">isolation &amp; purification</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">journal</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">method</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">microbiology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Poultry Diseases</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Print</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Psittacosis</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reagent Kits,Diagnostic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research Support</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">result</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">results</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sample</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Samples</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SB - IM</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SENSITIVITY</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sensitivity and Specificity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">specific</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">specificity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">State</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">study</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Swab</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Test</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Turkey</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Turkeys</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">United Kingdom</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">United-kingdom</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Universities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">university</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">veterinary</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1994</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0/6/1994</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1474</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">32</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1470 - 1474</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Five commercially available immunoassays were evaluated for the detection of Chlamydia psittaci in cloacal and conjunctival swabs from industrially raised turkeys: IMAGEN (DAKO Diagnostics, Ely, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom), Chlamydia CEL-VET IF (Cellabs, Brookvale, Australia), IDEIA (DAKO Diagnostics), CELISA (Cellabs), and CLEARVIEW (Unipath, Bedford, United Kingdom). Results were compared with isolation in Buffalo Green Monkey cells as a reference method. For the conjunctival samples, the sensitivities of the IMAGEN test, the Chlamydia CEL-VET IF test, the IDEIA, the CELISA, and the CLEARVIEW test were found to be 100, 66, 0, 0, and 0%, respectively, as compared to the reference test. Also for the conjunctival samples, the specificities of the IMAGEN test, the Chlamydia CEL-VET IF test, and the IDEIA were found to be 100, 11, and 92.8%, respectively. For the cloacal specimens, the sensitivities of the IMAGEN test, the Chlamydia CEL-VET IF test, the IDEIA, the CELISA, and the CLEARVIEW test were found to be 100, 93.3, 26.6, 0, and 53.3%, respectively. Also for the cloacal specimens, the specificities of the IMAGEN test, the Chlamydia CEL-VET IF test, the IDEIA, and the CLEARVIEW test were found to be 92, 12, 100, and 88%, respectively. The IMAGEN test was the most sensitive and specific direct chlamydia antigen detection test for cloacal and conjunctival samples from turkeys</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">39042</style></custom1><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1470</style></section></record></records></xml>