<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>46</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Y. Devos</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reheul,D.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adinda De Schrijver</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Considerations of cross-fertilization between GM and non-GM Maize</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ISB News Report</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">March</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6 - 9</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Member states will impose strict technical management measures to keep the adventitious presence of GM material in non-GM produce below the labeling thresholds. As maize is a cross-pollinated crop relying on wind for dispersal of its pollen, on-farm measures may rely on spatial isolation. The task may be difficult, since various biological, physical, experimental, and analytical parameters with varying levels of importance have been identified to play a role in the study of cross-fertilization in maize. The number of variables and their variability may hamper the comparison between research results and make it difficult to define the appropriate length of isolation distances and/or pollen barriers. How some of the parameters can hamper the comparison between research results is addressed below.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">38685</style></custom1></record></records></xml>